Jump to Navigation

Legal Effects of H.B. No. 189 and Deferred Adjudication for DWI

Should House Bill No. 189 be enacted into law, it will go into effect on September 1, 2011. If the bill's current draft were not changed, first time DWI offenders will be able to receive deferred adjudication community supervision and avoid a conviction for DWI. However, H.B. No. 189 proposes other significant changes to DWI related statutes that must be considered by lawyers and defendants before accepting a plea for deferred adjudication. The proposed bill seeks to amend the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Penal Code and the Government Code.

The Code of Criminal Procedure designates which offenses are eligible for deferred adjudication in Article 42.12 § 5. Under current Texas law, 42.12 § 5(d) specifically excludes DWI offenses from eligibility. As drafted, H.B. No. 189 seeks to amend 42.12 § 5(d) to make Driving While Intoxicated (Penal Code § 49.04), Flying While Intoxicated (Penal Code § 49.05), Boating While Intoxicated (Penal Code § 49.06) and Assembling or Operating an Amusement Ride While Intoxicated (Penal Code § 49.065) offenses eligible for deferred adjudication.

The Government Code authorizes people who have completed deferred adjudication in Texas to have their criminal record sealed by obtaining an Order of Nondisclosure in Article 411.081. Certain offenses are specifically excluded and made ineligible for Nondisclosure. As drafted, H.B. No. 189 seeks to amend 411.081(e) to exclude the DWI related offenses mentioned above from eligibility of Nondisclosure. Defendants who complete deferred adjudication under the proposed bill would not be able to seal the record of their DWI arrest or plea.

The Penal Code defines criminal offenses, designates penalties, and allows for enhancement of penalties under Texas law. Chapter 49 of the Penal Code is titled "Intoxication & Alcoholic Beverage Offenses." H.B. No. 189 seeks to amend sections (b) and (g) of Article 49.09. Section (g) deals with enhancement of DWI offenses. For purposes of this discussion, a DWI may be enhanced to a higher offense level based only on a prior conviction. (DWI related offenses such as DWI w/ a Child Passenger, Intoxication Assault and Intoxication Manslaughter are not eligible for deferred adjudication and are not included in H.B. No. 189) The proposed bill expands the definition of a conviction for enhancement purposes to include deferred adjudication. For example, a person granted deferred adjudication for a DWI 1st will be enhanced to a DWI 2nd for a subsequent offense under H.B. No. 189.

* H.B. No. 189 seeks to amend Article 49.09(b) to include § 49.045 (Driving While Intoxicated with Child Passenger). The bill does not intend to make this section eligible for deferred adjudication. For more information about how this bill may affect a San Antonio DWI you can contact Kyle Simpson (210) 224-4242.

Related Articles:

Kyle Simpson - San Antonio DWI Attorney - 321 S. Flores - San Antonio, Texas 78204
Your Texas DWI Website | Google Review of Your Texas DWI

See Kyle Simpson's interview on KSAT's website
Texas DWI Case Results
  • Client stopped for speeding and arrested for DWI based on poor performance on field sobriety tests. Case dismissed.
  • Client involved in hit and run accident. Officer observed several signs of intoxication and a poor performance on field sobriety tests. Case dismissed.
  • Client arrested for DWI based on field sobriety tests and breath test refusal. Case Dismissed.
  • Client approached at service station reading map in vehicle. Arrested for poor performance on field sobriety tests. Case dismissed.
  • Client stopped for expired inspection sticker. Performed extremely poor on field sobriety tests and blew a .17 BAC. Received time served for one day in county jail with no probation.
  • Client stopped in residential neighborhood and arrested for DWI. Officer credibility destroyed after conflicting testimony at ALR and County Court hearing. Case dismissed.
  • Client arrested for possession of controlled substance (cocaine) and DWI. Felony dismissed for a pre trial diversion on the DWI. DWI eventually dismissed.
  • Client arrested after flipping his vehicle on a country road and poor performance on field sobriety tests. Case dismissed after completing a pre trial diversion.
  • Client arrested for poor performance on field sobriety tests and breath test refusal. Officer unable to recall details at motion to suppress. Case dismissed at trial.
  • Client arrested for DWI based on anonymous witness complaint to police about erratic driving. Could not recite alphabet and performed poorly on field sobriety tests. Jury found not guilty.
  • Client determined to be intoxicated based on field sobriety tests. Evidence excluded due to illegal road block administered by officer. Case dismissed.
  • Client submitted a breath test with a .16 BAC. The officer testified that stop was initiated due to client failing to maintain a single lane. Case dismissed.
  • Client arrested for DWI and refused breath test. Judge found at the license hearing that officer could not articulate a valid reason for the stop. Client did not lose license.
  • Administrative Law Judge convinced that breath test coerced by officer. Client kept license.
  • Client arrested for DWI 2nd. Case reduced to Reckless Driving on day of trial.
  • Client arrested for DWI due to poor performance on field sobriety tests and a BAC above the legal limit. Case reduced to public intoxication.
  • Client, while serving probation for a DWI 1st, is arrested for DWI 2nd and Driving While License Invalid. DWI 2nd was dismissed and continued on probation for the DWI 1st and Driving While License Invalid.
  • Client had 4 previous DWI convictions, two misdemeanors and two felonies. Client is arrested a 5th and 6th time two months apart in separate counties. Probation is granted in both cases and run concurrent.
  • Client stopped for speeding and failing to maintain a single lane. Arrested after performing poorly on field sobriety tests and blows a .168 BAC. Jury found not guilty.
  • Client is arrested for DWI 1st. While awaiting trial is arrested a second time for DWI. Client receives time served for one DWI and has the other DWI dismissed. No probation.
  • Client involved in single car accident. Arrested for DWI after performing poorly on field sobriety tests and refusing a breath test. Case dismissed on day of trial after picking a jury.
  • Client rear ended an occupied vehicle at a red light. Arrested for a DWI 2nd after performing poorly on field sobriety tests and refusing a breath test. Case dismissed on day of trial.
  • Client involved in accident, charged with DWI 2nd after failing all Standardized Field Sobriety tests, received judgment satisfied with no probation.
  • Client pulled over for failing to maintain single lane and striking the curb. Charged with DWI 2nd after refusing to submit to the Standardized Field Sobriety tests and using profane language with the arresting officer, received judgment satisfied with no probation.
  • Client arrested after accident for DWI 1st. Client failed all Standardized Field Sobriety tests and provided a breath specimen of .20. Case dismissed.
  • Client pulled over doing 65 mph in a 40 mph zone. Client failed all Standardized Field Sobriety tests, used profanity with the officer and refused to submit a breath test specimen. Case Dismissed.
  • Client pulled over for failing to maintain a single lane of traffic. Client failed all Standardized Field Sobriety tests and refused to submit a breath test specimen. After successfully arguing that the client's Constitutional rights were violated during the stop, the court granted a Motion to Suppress. Case dismissed.
  • Client was a minor when pulled over for running a stop sign. Client was charged with a DWI 1st after failing all Standardized Field Sobriety tests. Case dismissed.
  • Client charged with a DWI 2nd after being pulled over for not displaying his headlights. Client failed all Standardized Field Sobriety tests and submitted a breath test specimen of a .21. Case dismissed.
  • Client arrested while in parking lot asleep at the wheel of a running vehicle. Client failed all Standardized Field Sobriety tests and submitted a blood specimen that showed a Blood Alcohol Concentration of .22. Officer testified at License Suspension hearing that he approached vehicle under the community caretaking exception. Administrative judge found that the officer did not have Constitutionally valid reason to initiate a detention. Client kept his license.
  • Client arrested for a 4th DWI while on probation for a DWI 3rd. Client submitted a blood specimen that showed a Blood Alcohol Concentration of .29 (over three times the legal limit). The client's original probation was continued after the Motion to Revoke was withdrawn. Client received probation for the 4th DWI.
  • Client stopped for failing to maintain a single lane of traffic. Client performed well on all Standardized Field Sobriety tests. Case dismissed.
  • Client involved in a rollover accident. Client failed all Standardized Field Sobriety tests and submitted a breath test specimen that showed a Blood Alcohol Concentration over the legal limit. Client received a Pre Trial Diversion. Case dismissed.
View All Results
Criminal Defense
Simpson, Foster, and Gold, LLP is a BBB Accredited Business. Click for the BBB Business Review of this Attorneys in San Antonio TX
Office Location

Kyle Simpson & Charles Gold
321 S Flores St
San Antonio, TX 78204

Toll Free: 888-392-1813
Local: 210-224-4242
Fax: 210-222-1253
email | San Antonio Law Office